On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:06:48AM +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)
wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:54:09AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:44:11AM +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)
> > wrote:
> > > check return value of kzalloc and return error if it fails.
> > >
> >
> > There is a problem with your patch. See if you can spot it. Also can
> > you add to the changelog what are the user visible effects of not
> > checking for kzalloc() failure? Last time with ->flipbuf there were no
> > user visible effects.
> >
> > Also return -ENOMEM seems like the wrong thing. Shouldn't we do some
> > error handling. Also you are not working on linux-next? Some of this
> > stuff is done correctly in linux-next.
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> >
>
> Dan,I am working on the staging-testing git tree.I was not aware that
> someone has submitted a similar patch which was reviewed by you &
> sudip.If a patch to address this has already gone in,why am I not seeing
> that change here.Am I missing something ?
Something is wrong. You should see:
commit fa52d96c3ea110acb77e51c856ec0b54606cc17e
Author: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevic...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Apr 10 02:42:29 2015 +0300
staging: dgnc: clean up allocation of ->channels[i]
regards,
dan carpenter
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
