On May 22, 2015, at 8:18 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>> I wonder what is more clear about that in your opinion ve >>>> lustre_error/lustre_debug? >>> >>> The fact that you have to explain this shows that it's >>> at least misleading unless you completely understand the >>> code. >> >> Or you know, you might take the function name at the face value >> and assume that CERROR means it's an error and CDEBUG means it's a debug >> message? > > Maybe, but I think that it'd be better if the mechanism > it uses was more plainly named something like lustre_log.
While the idea seems good, the biggest obstacle here is such that there's already a thing called lustre log (llog for short too) - it's kind of a distributed journal of operations. Its there a different synonym, I wonder? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
