Hello Oleg, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 01:53:35AM +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote: > Hello! > > On May 12, 2015, at 6:43 PM, George G. Davis wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Resending this using the correct version of get_maintainers.pl. > > > > As recommended in the thread "SPDX-License-Identifier” [1], I would like to > > followup with the > > maintainers of the file > > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h regarding the GPLv3 > > license statement contained in that file [2]. Is there an GPLv3 exception > > clause which can be applied > > for this file similar to the bison exception clause or is this file > > licensed only under GPLv3 only in which > > case it would appear to be incompatible with the Linux kernel license [3]? > > Duh. > It appears that the file was automatically generated in the lustre tree with > autogen and somebody forgot to > specify gpl version, so it defaulted to v3: > [= (gpl "lustre" " * ") =] > > > Thanks. > > I think we'll be able to change that to gplv2 easily (to match the rest of > Lustre).
Awesome, thanks! Looking forward to the patch. : ) -- Regards, George > > Bye, > Oleg _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
