On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:07:46PM -0400, Benjamin Romer wrote:
> -BOOL visor_periodic_work_nextperiod(PERIODIC_WORK *periodic_work)
> +BOOL visor_periodic_work_nextperiod(struct periodic_work *pw)
> {
> BOOL rc = FALSE;
>
> - write_lock(&periodic_work->lock);
> - if (periodic_work->want_to_stop) {
> - periodic_work->is_scheduled = FALSE;
> - periodic_work->want_to_stop = FALSE;
> + write_lock(&pw->lock);
> + if (pw->want_to_stop) {
> + pw->is_scheduled = FALSE;
> + pw->want_to_stop = FALSE;
> rc = TRUE; /* yes, TRUE; see visor_periodic_work_stop() */
> - goto Away;
> - } else if (queue_delayed_work(periodic_work->workqueue,
> - &periodic_work->work,
> - periodic_work->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
> - ERRDEV(periodic_work->devnam, "queue_delayed_work failed!");
> - periodic_work->is_scheduled = FALSE;
> + goto unlock;
> + } else if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
> + pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
This triggeres a static checker warning now that we're using bool
instead of BOOL (int) because bool is never negative.
> + ERRDEV(pw->devnam, "queue_delayed_work failed!");
> + pw->is_scheduled = FALSE;
> rc = FALSE;
> - goto Away;
> + goto unlock;
> }
> rc = TRUE;
> -Away:
> - write_unlock(&periodic_work->lock);
> +unlock:
> + write_unlock(&pw->lock);
> return rc;
> }
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
