On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 03:19:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:03:06AM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > "Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)" <hguju...@visteon.com> writes: > > > Remove the goto and return error directly thereby removing a variable > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hguju...@visteon.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723au/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 7 ++----- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > NACK! > > SHOUTING! > > > > > The goto is cleaner and more consistent, rather than hiding a return in > > the middle of the code. > > More consistent with what? There are already returns earlier in the > function. Do-nothing gotos are pointless and annoying. > > regards, > dan carpenter >
I sent this patch because goto & return was mixed up in this function. There was a return as well as goto used. And i guess goto is not encouraged anywhere. In this case especially,I couldn't see any significant cleanup being done in the goto label. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
