On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:25:43PM -0400, Ben Romer wrote: > On 05/06/2015 08:15 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >Also there were some unrelated changes. Benjamin, you should have > >complained about those when the patch was first sent. That's like the > >most obvious thing to check when you're reviewing patches. > > I'm sorry, I don't understand what part of this is unrelated? To me > it looked like Prarit was refactoring the function and its > subroutines, mostly the error handling but also cleanup. I've sent > similar patches in the past that were refactoring patches, and the > patch does what it says in the description, so I thought it was > okay.
Fine fine. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
