> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuzn...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 16:18
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Dexuan Cui
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: do cleanup on all vmbus_open()
> failure paths
> 
> In case there was an error reported in the response to the
> CHANNELMSG_OPENCHANNEL
> call we need to do the cleanup as a vmbus_open() user won't be doing it
> after
> receiving an error. The cleanup should be done on all failure paths.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/channel.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel.c b/drivers/hv/channel.c
> index 54da66d..836386f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/channel.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/channel.c
> @@ -186,11 +186,12 @@ int vmbus_open(struct vmbus_channel
> *newchannel, u32 send_ringbuffer_size,
>       list_del(&open_info->msglistentry);
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmbus_connection.channelmsg_lock,
> flags);
> 
> -     if (err == 0)
> -             newchannel->state = CHANNEL_OPENED_STATE;
> +     if (err != 0)
> +             goto error_gpadl;
> 
> +     newchannel->state = CHANNEL_OPENED_STATE;
>       kfree(open_info);
> -     return err;
> +     return 0;
> 
>  error1:
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&vmbus_connection.channelmsg_lock, flags);
> --

Thanks for the patch, Vitaly!

The patch looks good to me except for 1 small issue:
I suppose open_info->response.open_result.status is different from
Linux-style -EXXX error codes.

Maybe here we can return -EAGAIN if err != 0 ?

-- Dexuan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to