If you checked the code, you would see that it's used in 
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c too.

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c:extern struct cfs_wi_sched 
*cfs_sched_rehash;
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c:                           rc, 
&cfs_sched_rehash);
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c:  if (cfs_sched_rehash != NULL) {
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c:          
cfs_wi_sched_destroy(cfs_sched_rehash);
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c:          cfs_sched_rehash = NULL;


On Apr 6, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Nickolaus Woodruff wrote:

> This patch fixes the following sparse warning:
> 
> CHECK   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c:119:21: warning: symbol
> 'cfs_sched_rehash' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nickolaus Woodruff <nickolauswoodr...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
> index a55567e..a4920a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ module_param(warn_on_depth, uint, 0644);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(warn_on_depth, "warning when hash depth is high.");
> #endif
> 
> -struct cfs_wi_sched *cfs_sched_rehash;
> +static struct cfs_wi_sched *cfs_sched_rehash;
> 
> static inline void
> cfs_hash_nl_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive) {}
> --
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HPDD-discuss mailing list
> hpdd-disc...@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to