Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 11, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
>> @@ -652,6 +652,7 @@ static void hv_mem_hot_add(unsigned long start, unsigned 
>> long size,
>>                      }
>>                      has->ha_end_pfn -= HA_CHUNK;
>>                      has->covered_end_pfn -=  processed_pfn;
>> +                    mutex_lock(&dm_device.ha_region_mutex);
>>                      break;
>>              }
>
> Should it call the wrapper instead of doing mutex_lock directly?
> Like 'acquire_region_mutex(false);'.

My "Drivers: hv: hv_balloon: eliminate the trylock path in
acquire/release_region_mutex" (b05d8d9ef5ef21d1b18440430f950304836e1aaa
in char-misc-next) removed these wrappers.

>
> Olaf

-- 
  Vitaly
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to