Lorenzo,

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 06:42:53PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> This patch fixes errors raised by checkpatch.pl relating to use of C99 
> comments
> in r8192U_dm.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoa...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c | 841 
> ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 432 insertions(+), 409 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c 
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
> index 936565d..44f4c38 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
> @@ -21,14 +21,15 @@ Major Change History:
>  #include "r8190_rtl8256.h"
>  #include "r819xU_cmdpkt.h"
>  /*---------------------------Define Local 
> Constant---------------------------*/
> -//
> -// Indicate different AP vendor for IOT issue.
> -//
> -static u32 edca_setting_DL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] =
> -             { 0x5e4322,     0x5e4322,       0x5e4322,       0x604322,       
> 0xa44f,         0x5ea44f};
> -static u32 edca_setting_UL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] =
> -             { 0x5e4322,     0xa44f,         0x5e4322,       0x604322,       
> 0x5ea44f,       0x5ea44f};
> -
> +/*
> + * Indicate different AP vendor for IOT issue.
> + */
This is OK.

> +static u32 edca_setting_DL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] = {
> +     0x5e4322, 0x5e4322, 0x5e4322, 0x604322, 0xa44f, 0x5ea44f
> +};
> +static u32 edca_setting_UL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] = {
> +     0x5e4322, 0xa44f, 0x5e4322, 0x604322, 0x5ea44f, 0x5ea44f
> +};
But this change is not related to C99 comments and you didn't
explain why this change was made in your log message.
It should probably be in a separate patch.

[...]

-- 
- Jeremiah Mahler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to