> 
> Signed-off-by: Son Le <sonle....@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/nokia_h4p/nokia_core.c   |    2 +-
>  drivers/staging/nokia_h4p/nokia_fw-csr.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/staging/nokia_h4p/nokia_uart.c   |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nokia_h4p/nokia_core.c 
> b/drivers/staging/nokia_h4p/nokia_core.c
> index 775e1d0..bab01e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nokia_h4p/nokia_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nokia_h4p/nokia_core.c
> @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static int hci_h4p_reset(struct hci_h4p_info *info)
>  
>       gpio_set_value(info->reset_gpio, 0);
>       gpio_set_value(info->bt_wakeup_gpio, 1);
> -     msleep(10);
> +     usleep_range(10000, 10500);
>  

I don't see how new code is superior to the old one. If checkpatch
warns about this, perhaps checkpatch should be fixed?

                                                                        Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to