On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 12:13 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This is the same bug I mentioned ealier in a different patch.
Yes, I know that - my intent was to get this patch in to move the entry, then fix the error in the function, like how the other sysfs functions got fixed. The code in this patches' sysfs functions is a cut and paste of what was in parahotplug_proc_write() with small modifications so that it will build. I'll split this into a patch that deletes the proc entry, and a separate patch that adds the sysfs entries with corrected code, then. Hopefully I won't get any complaints about that being too many logical changes. -- Ben Romer | Software Engineer | Virtual Systems Development Unisys Corporation | 2476 Swedesford Rd | Malvern, PA 19355 | 610-648-7140 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
