Fix checkpatch issue: "CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt".  I picked 100 us as a reasonable
upper bound, but it's not that critical.

Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbo...@mev.co.uk>
---
 drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/amplc_pci230.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/amplc_pci230.c 
b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/amplc_pci230.c
index 76c4625..00d7a22 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/amplc_pci230.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/amplc_pci230.c
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ static int pci230_ai_cmd(struct comedi_device *dev, 
struct comedi_subdevice *s)
         * channel gains and scan list _before_ the first FIFO reset also
         * helps, though only slightly.
         */
-       udelay(25);
+       usleep_range(25, 100);
 
        /* Reset FIFO again. */
        outw(adccon | PCI230_ADC_FIFO_RESET, dev->iobase + PCI230_ADCCON);
-- 
2.0.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to