Dan,

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 07:52:53AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:34:56PM +0200, Riccardo Lucchese wrote:
> > It is silly to go through an if statement to set a single boolean
> > value in function of a single boolean expression. In the function
> > lov_check_set, assign the return value directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucch...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c | 11 +++++------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c 
> > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
> > index ce830e4..90fc66a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
> > @@ -140,14 +140,13 @@ void lov_set_add_req(struct lov_request *req, struct 
> > lov_request_set *set)
> >  
> >  static int lov_check_set(struct lov_obd *lov, int idx)
> >  {
> > -   int rc = 0;
> > +   int rc;
> >     mutex_lock(&lov->lov_lock);
> >  
> > -   if (lov->lov_tgts[idx] == NULL ||
> > -       lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_active ||
> > -       (lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp != NULL &&
> > -        class_exp2cliimp(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried))
> > -           rc = 1;
> > +   rc = lov->lov_tgts[idx] == NULL ||
> > +           lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_active ||
> > +           (lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp != NULL &&
> > +            
> > class_exp2cliimp(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried);
> 
> I don't see how this makes the code more readable at all.

Thank you for the comment. Would you consider something like the
following diff instead ? Otherwise, I will resend the series for
review without this change.

riccardo

---

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
index ce830e4..ae670bb 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
@@ -140,14 +140,14 @@ void lov_set_add_req(struct lov_request *req, struct 
lov_request_set *set)
 
 static int lov_check_set(struct lov_obd *lov, int idx)
 {
-       int rc = 0;
+       int rc;
+       struct lov_tgt_desc *desc;
        mutex_lock(&lov->lov_lock);
 
-       if (lov->lov_tgts[idx] == NULL ||
-           lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_active ||
-           (lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp != NULL &&
-            class_exp2cliimp(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried))
-               rc = 1;
+       desc = lov->lov_tgts[idx];
+       rc = !desc || desc->ltd_active ||
+               (desc->ltd_exp &&
+                class_exp2cliimp(desc->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried);
 
        mutex_unlock(&lov->lov_lock);
        return rc;
-- 
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to