On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 10:15 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:58:14PM +0800, Cheng-Wei Lee wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Lee <lee.rhaps...@gmail.com>
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
[]
> > @@ -3533,7 +3533,6 @@ static void hfa384x_usbin_rx(wlandevice_t
> > *wlandev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > }
> >
> > done:
> > - return;
> > }
>
> That's a good thing to do, but it is not what you said you did up above
> in the changelog entry.
I don't believe it's a good thing to do at all.
I suspect more that this wasn't compile tested.
This doesn't compile for at least several
supported gcc versions.
gcc doesn't (didn't? I haven't tried 4.9) like:
label:
}
to terminate a function definition.
$ cat label_test.c
void func(void)
{
goto label;
label:
}
$
with gcc 4.8:
$ gcc label_test.c
label_test.c: In function ‘func’:
label_test.c:5:1: error: label at end of compound statement
label:
^
whereas this compiles fine:
$ cat label_test2.c
void func(void)
{
goto label;
label:
;
}
$
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
