On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:38:04AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
> index dc044cf..eb747d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
> @@ -383,13 +383,14 @@ ConstructNullFunctionData(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
> u8 *pframe,
> }
>
> if (bQoS == true) {
> - struct ieee80211_qos_hdr *pwlanqoshdr;
> + struct ieee80211_qos_hdr *qoshdr;
> + qoshdr = (struct ieee80211_qos_hdr *)pframe;
Checkpatch complains about these nowadays.
It's obviously a minor thing. No need to resend. No need to respond to
this email at all, in fact.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
