On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:10 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 05:04:00PM +0530, karthik alapati wrote: > > fix sparse warning by casting to explicit user address-space > > pointer type > > > > Signed-off-by: karthik alapati <m...@karthek.com> > > --- > > drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c > > b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c > > index 6f9666dc0..70570e8a5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c > > @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int p80211knetdev_do_ioctl(struct net_device > > *dev, > > goto bail; > > } > > > > - msgbuf = memdup_user(req->data, req->len); > > + msgbuf = memdup_user((void __user *)req->data, req->len); > > This doesn't fix anything it just silences the warning. Linus Torvalds > worked very hard to create Sparse for the express purpose of printing > the warning. People don't realize that warnings are very valuable > because they show where the bugs are. > > Please look at this some more and figure out how to fix the warning. > > To be honest, I'm tempted to not accept any patch which doesn't also fix > the buffer overflows when we pass: > > result = p80211req_dorequest(wlandev, msgbuf); > > How do we know that "msgbuf" is large enough? > > regards, > dan carpenter >
Thanks dan but right after sending this patch i immediately replied to it stating to ignore this patch as i found this already applied in staging-testing branch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/commit/?h=staging-testing&id=3a8a144d2a754df45127c74e273fa166f690ba43 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
