Em Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:56:31 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> escreveu:

> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:56:41AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 18:35 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:  
> > > Instead of using 1/0 for true/false, change the type to boolean
> > > and change the returned value.  
> > []  
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/phy-hi3670-usb3.c 
> > > b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/phy-hi3670-usb3.c  
> > []  
> > > @@ -326,24 +326,24 @@ static int hi3670_phy_set_params(struct hi3670_priv 
> > > *priv)
> > >   return ret;
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > -static int hi3670_is_abbclk_seleted(struct hi3670_priv *priv)
> > > +static bool hi3670_is_abbclk_seleted(struct hi3670_priv *priv)  
> > 
> > Presumably this should be "selected" not "seleted"

True. I'll fix it.

> >   
> > >  {
> > >   u32 reg;
> > > 
> > >   if (!priv->sctrl) {
> > >           dev_err(priv->dev, "priv->sctrl is null!\n");
> > > -         return 1;
> > > +         return true;
> > >   }
> > > 
> > >   if (regmap_read(priv->sctrl, SCTRL_SCDEEPSLEEPED, &reg)) {
> > >           dev_err(priv->dev, "SCTRL_SCDEEPSLEEPED read failed!\n");
> > > -         return 1;
> > > +         return true;
> > >   }
> > > 
> > >   if ((reg & USB_CLK_SELECTED) == 0)
> > > -         return 1;
> > > +         return true;
> > > 
> > > - return 0;
> > > + return false;
> > >  }  
> > 
> >     if (foo)
> >             return true;
> >     return false;
> > 
> > should generally be consolidated into a single test.  
> 
> I quite prefer the original format, but you're right about the return
> looking reversed.  Using "return !!(reg & USB_CLK_SELECTED);" is
> especially problematic.  I like !! but Linus has commented a couple
> times that he doesn't like !!.

Me to. "return !!(reg & USB_CLK_SELECTED)" just obfuscates the
source code, imho for no good reason. It sounds a lot easier to
read something like:

        if (cond1)
                return true;
        if (cond2)
                return true;
        if (cond3)
                return true;

        return false;

Yet, I agree that the logic here seems to be inverted.


> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> 



Thanks,
Mauro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to