Fixed a checkpatch warning:

WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
 #4595: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4595:
+/****************************************************************************
+

The code is full of comments like this. Should the coding style
be inforced here, even when there is a logic to the way the code
was broken up?

Signed-off-by: Daniel West <daniel.west....@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c 
b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index 8794907a39f4..adf2788a416f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -4591,11 +4591,10 @@ void mlmeext_sta_del_event_callback(struct adapter 
*padapter)
        }
 }
 
-/****************************************************************************
-
-Following are the functions for the timer handlers
-
-*****************************************************************************/
+/*
+ *
+ *Following are the functions for the timer handlers
+ */
 
 static u8 chk_ap_is_alive(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
 {
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to