On 01.09.2020 19:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Antoni Przybylik wrote:
This approach is more elegant and prevents some problems related to
macros such as operator precedence in expanded expression.
Signed-off-by: Antoni Przybylik <antoni.przyby...@wp.pl>
---
drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
index 6e813693a766..a7db0672e81d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
#define MUX_TX_MAX_SIZE 2048
-#define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count)
-
static struct tty_driver *gdm_driver[TTY_MAX_COUNT];
static struct gdm *gdm_table[TTY_MAX_COUNT][GDM_TTY_MINOR];
static DEFINE_MUTEX(gdm_table_lock);
@@ -36,6 +34,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(gdm_table_lock);
static const char *DRIVER_STRING[TTY_MAX_COUNT] = {"GCTATC", "GCTDM"};
static char *DEVICE_STRING[TTY_MAX_COUNT] = {"GCT-ATC", "GCT-DM"};
+static int gdm_tty_ready(gdm *gdm)
+{
+ return (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count);
+}
You obviously did not even build this patch, which is a bit rude, don't
you think?
:(
I'm stupid. I misconfigured the kernel. I fixed this bug and sent a new
patch.
Linux configuration script is horrible...
Antoni Przybylik
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
