Hello!
On May 3, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> I don't think I saw complaints about proc files, the complaints I saw were
>> mostly about
>> reading env variables directly and the like so that was the focus of this
>> patch.
>> Did I miss some side discussion? Any pointers?
> No, no side discussion, the proc files need to be removed / fixed before
> the code can be merged to the "proper" part of the kernel tree.
So, what's broken about them then?
It's not like there are no files in proc or that lustre-proc files are causing
some
sort of breakage (at least not anymore after that recent patch).
So some guidance would be really appreciated.
Bye,
Oleg
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
