It should never be NULL because our interface list is up to date,
and even if it does, we'll just crash anyway so we are no better off.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.dro...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
index 21d36ee..a391d13 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
@@ -793,8 +793,6 @@ ksocknal_select_ips(ksock_peer_t *peer, __u32 *peerips, int 
n_peerips)
                        ip = peer->ksnp_passive_ips[i];
                        best_iface = ksocknal_ip2iface(peer->ksnp_ni, ip);
 
-                       /* peer passive ips are kept up to date */
-                       LASSERT(best_iface != NULL);
                } else {
                        /* choose a new interface */
                        LASSERT (i == peer->ksnp_n_passive_ips);
@@ -835,8 +833,6 @@ ksocknal_select_ips(ksock_peer_t *peer, __u32 *peerips, int 
n_peerips)
                        peer->ksnp_n_passive_ips = i+1;
                }
 
-               LASSERT (best_iface != NULL);
-
                /* mark the best matching peer IP used */
                j = ksocknal_match_peerip(best_iface, peerips, n_peerips);
                peerips[j] = 0;
-- 
1.9.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to