On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 09:32:35PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote:
> These are the minimum changes required to get the code to build
> statically in the kernel.  It's necessary to do this first so that we
> can empirically determine that future cleanup patches aren't changing
> the generated object code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net>

This doesn't apply to my latest tree :(

> --- a/drivers/staging/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/staging/Makefile
> @@ -65,3 +65,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XILLYBUS)              += xillybus/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DGNC)                   += dgnc/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DGAP)                   += dgap/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_SPINAND_MT29F)      += mt29f_spinand/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_SKEIN) += skein/

Care to align these up with the way this file is formatted?

And I have no objection to taking the drivers/staging/ patches, the
script looks useful, but I can't take it through the staging tree,
sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to