On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 07:36:31AM +0900, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Greg, > > >>>>> while this is patch is correct, I do not really care about staging > >>>>> drivers that actually bluntly violate my copyright. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> That's very cryptic. > >>>> > >>>> What is going on here? I googled it and I wasn't able to find what you > >>>> are talking about. Care to give us a hint and what you want us to do > >>>> here? > >>> > >>> the last time I checked, the majority of drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c has > >>> been written by myself. Now go and compare btusb.c to btmtk_usb.[ch]. > >>> > >>>> I have also added Johan Hedberg to the CC list because he also helped > >>>> break the build. Don't do that. > >>> > >>> Yes, we are doing exactly that. It is a staging driver. I could not care > >>> less if a staging drivers breaks the build or not. > >>> > >>> If anybody cares about this driver, then take the time to merge it > >>> upstream. It has never been submitted to linux-bluetooth mailing list. > >>> > >>> There are drivers that should have never been merged into staging. > >>> This is one of them. Look for yourself and explain to me why this > >>> driver is part of staging in the first place. > >> > >> Because it was sent to me by a developer? > > > > it is a problem when staging just becomes a dumping ground for drivers that > > the distributions find somewhere on the Internet or CD-ROMs. And then > > nobody has any intentions to clean up and integrate properly. This one did > > not even go through linux-bluetooth mailing list once. It was submitted > > right to staging. And then the submitter walked away. > > and if I quote the TODO file: > > TODO: > - checkpatch.pl clean > - determine if the driver should not be using a duplicate > version of the usb-bluetooth interface code, but should > be merged into the drivers/bluetooth/ directory and > infrastructure instead. > - review by the bluetooth developer community > > Please send any patches for this driver to Yu-Chen, Cho <a...@suse.com> and > jay.h...@mediatek.com > > So from the submission we can assume that the submitter knew that this > was duplicated code. The code also never got submitted for review to > linux-bluetooth. And now 6 month later, none of the TODO items have > been actually worked on. > > I do not know what your timeline is for removing drivers from staging, > but this one seems to be a good candidate to get removed next.
6 months without any active contribution to getting it cleaned up and merged is the timeline. Which this one fits, so yes, I will remove it for 3.14, unless Jay or Cho is going to start doing work on this. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
