On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:39:11PM +0200, Martin Berglund wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 03:27:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 02:08:07PM +0200, Martin Berglund wrote:
> > > @@ -508,9 +506,8 @@ static void sm7xx_set_timing(struct smtcfb_info *sfb)
> > >  
> > >                   /* init SEQ register SR30 - SR75 */
> > >                   for (i = 0; i < SIZE_SR30_SR75; i++)
> > > -                         if (((i + 0x30) != 0x62) \
> > > -                                 && ((i + 0x30) != 0x6a) \
> > > -                                 && ((i + 0x30) != 0x6b))
> > > +                         if (((i + 0x30) != 0x62) && ((i + 0x30) != 0x6a)
> > > +                                                 && ((i + 0x30) != 0x6b))
> > 
> > The prefered way would be to align this like this:
> > 
> >                             if ((i + 0x30) != 0x62 &&
> >                                 (i + 0x30) != 0x6a &&
> >                                 (i + 0x30) != 0x6b)
> > 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> > 
> 
> New patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Berglund <mar...@rogsta.net>

Can you please resend this in a format I can apply it in, without
needing to edit the patch body by hand?  I deal with thousands of
patches every month, and if I have to edit them all, that cuts down my
ability to apply them greatly.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to