On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Jürgen Beisert wrote:
> I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series of 
> SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this "new style" will be accepted?
> 

My lradc_plate_mask() is basically the same idea as what Marek said
about putting the logic into the define.

LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) == MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff)

I don't know why Marek is complaining about churn though.  This is
linux!  We love churn!  And especially in staging, it's our favorite
thing.  :P

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to