Hi Paul, > Matthijs' concern about periodic endpoints with bInterval=1 seems > to be unfounded. I tried a webcam, which uses a bInterval=1 isoc > endpoint, on my PCI-based dev board, and it still works fine with > this patch applied. For the record, I still think this concern actually exists, but you will need to completely fill up the available bandwidth to notice the problem, since the scheduler is now too optimistic about how much bandwidth is availble when devices with bInterval < 8 are present (but pessimistic for devices with bInterval > 8).
However, this is something I think we can easily fix later, so getting this series in is a step forward anyway. I haven't got time to properly review and test these patches now, since I'm about to leave for a two-week vacation though. I did a quick scan just now and replied with some comments that occured to me. Gr. Matthijs _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
