From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> Now that drm_update_vblank_count() can be called even when we're not about to enable the vblank interrupts we shouldn't print debug messages stating otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c index e927e5f..87abca3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc) crtc, vblank->last, cur_vblank, diff); } - DRM_DEBUG("enabling vblank interrupts on crtc %d, missed %d\n", + DRM_DEBUG("updating vblank count on crtc %d, missed %d\n", crtc, diff); if (diff == 0) -- 1.8.5.5