https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #30 from Alex Deucher <agd5f at yahoo.com> --- (In reply to comment #29) > Hm, so actual problems were confirmed fixed with this? That seems rather > strange, since that would mean the hardware counted the clock cycles wrong > for the CTS value... Maybe the HW doesn't do it per-spec, instead > calculating CTS in some other way? Yes. Using the sw cts/n values resulted in better results across asics compared to the alternative fix (using the actual pll clock for the dto calculation). Using the hw cts/n values lead to playback speed issues on some asics. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131031/b9b68b06/attachment-0001.html>
