Ian Romanick <idr at freedesktop.org> writes: > From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com> > > The drm_intel_context structure is, wisely, opaque. However, libdrm > users may want to know the hardware context ID associated with the > structure.
We've had a bunch of our other structures be partially transparent. The context id to be passed to the kernel could easily be public just like the gem handle in a BO is public. I would lean slightly toward that. But I don't feel strongly either way, so these two are: Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131111/58ba2c89/attachment.pgp>
