https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #11 from Tom Stellard <tstellar at gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #10) > I've got a draft fix in my libclc repo on fdo.o. I've tested for > regressions on Cedar (successfully), and I will test on SI with your 64-bit > load patch asap (hopefully tonight, but we'll see). I took a look at your libclc fix, and I realized that we can't use address space qualifiers in common code, because addrspace(1) may not mean global address space on all targets. I think you might find that the optimizers are good enough to turn a .cl implementation into optimal code, but if not we may be have to move the LLVM IR implementations into target specific code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130628/6a561bdd/attachment.html>
