Op 24-07-13 17:55, Dan Carpenter schreef:
> Hello Maarten Lankhorst,
>
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>
> The patch 0108bc808107: "drm/nouveau: do not allow negative sizes for 
> now" from Jul 7, 2013, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:222 nouveau_bo_new()
>        warn: variable dereferenced before check 'drm->client.base.vm' (see 
> line 201)
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>    200                int type = ttm_bo_type_device;
>    201                int max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << 
> drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift) - 1);
>                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> New dereference.
>
>    202        
>    203                if (size <= 0 || size > max_size) {
>    204                        nv_warn(drm, "skipped size %x\n", (u32)size);
>    205                        return -EINVAL;
>    206                }
>    207        
>    208                if (sg)
>    209                        type = ttm_bo_type_sg;
>    210        
>    211                nvbo = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nouveau_bo), GFP_KERNEL);
>    212                if (!nvbo)
>    213                        return -ENOMEM;
>    214                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->head);
>    215                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->entry);
>    216                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->vma_list);
>    217                nvbo->tile_mode = tile_mode;
>    218                nvbo->tile_flags = tile_flags;
>    219                nvbo->bo.bdev = &drm->ttm.bdev;
>    220        
>    221                nvbo->page_shift = 12;
>    222                if (drm->client.base.vm) {
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Old check.
>
>    223                        if (!(flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TT) && size > 256 * 
> 1024)
>    224                                nvbo->page_shift = 
> drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift;
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter

8<-----
Commit 0108bc808107: "drm/nouveau: do not allow negative sizes for now" broke
older nvidia gpu's that lack a vm. Add an explicit check to handle this.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
Reported-by: konrad wilk <konrad.wilk at oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index c3c40e7..a92f774 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -198,7 +198,12 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct drm_device *dev, int size, int align,
        size_t acc_size;
        int ret;
        int type = ttm_bo_type_device;
-       int max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift) - 
1);
+       int lpg_shift = 12;
+       int max_size;
+
+       if (drm->client.base.vm)
+               lpg_shift = drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift;
+       max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << lpg_shift) - 1);

        if (size <= 0 || size > max_size) {
                nv_warn(drm, "skipped size %x\n", (u32)size);

Reply via email to