> So after a bit of irc chatting with Maarten this seems to be more > involved. The above check is to cache the dma mapping, but the > implementation is bogus in tons of ways: > - If direction changes we don't bother with unmaping and freeing the > mapping, but simply leak it. > - This will break if the dma mapping needs explicit syncing since the > helpers don't call sync_to_cpu/sync_to_device anywhere.
Right, and I believe I signed up for that. > > So I think I'll decline to poke around more in this hornet nest and > leave it at the locking removal. .. and I get the hornet nest :-). Is there a IRC log of what you guys talked about so I don't omit certain pieces of code.
