On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Joonyoung,
>
> Thank you for the patches.
>
> On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is the second version patchset.
>>
>> GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for
>> dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit
>> 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so
>> this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA specific functions to
>> using prime helpers.
>>
>>
>> To Laurent,
>>
>> It is merged a patch to cache mapping from DRM Prime, can this patchset
>> get your ack?
> There you go (and sorry for the late reply)
>
> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>
> By the way, between the initial version of the GEM CMA PRIME patch and the
> version that got merged in v3.10, commit
> 011c2282c74db120f01a8414edc66c3f217f5511 ("drm: prime: fix refcounting on the
> dmabuf import error path") was introduced. The GEM CMA PRIME code in v3.10
> thus has a refcounting bug :-(
>
> Should this patch set go to -stable, or should we cook up a special fix ?I'm not sure it's better to choose which way. Dave, how we should do about that problem?
