On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:59:22PM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> From: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho at samsung.com>
> 
> When drm iommu is not supported, buf->pages has to be allocated
> and assigned to phys_to_page() result, which type is struct page *.
> So it is sufficient to allocate buf->pages with multiple struct
> page pointer size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_buf.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_buf.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_buf.c
> index 22865ba..3200622 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_buf.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static int lowlevel_buffer_allocate(struct drm_device *dev,
>               dma_addr_t start_addr;
>               unsigned int i = 0;
>  
> -             buf->pages = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages,
> +             buf->pages = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page *) * nr_pages,
>                                       GFP_KERNEL);

Looks like a prime candidate for kcalloc()

>               if (!buf->pages) {
>                       DRM_ERROR("failed to allocate pages.\n");
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel OTC

Reply via email to