2013/01/31 19:03, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:27:26PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> I forgot to change subject. So I resend a patch.
>>
>> ---
>> acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status.
>>
>> The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of
>> acpi_bus_get_device().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki at jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> I've tried to apply this to drm-intel-next-queued, but git am didn't
> really like your patch - it failed to apply. Can you please rebase to the
> drm-intel-next-queued branch from
>
> git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel
>
> and please resubmit the patch, preferrably formatted with git
> format-patch?
My mailer added a space in the patch. I updated the patch.
How abot it?
---
acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status.
The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of
acpi_bus_get_device().
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki at jp.fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
index 7741c22..4d33874 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void intel_didl_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
int i = 0;
handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->pdev->dev);
- if (!handle || ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)))
+ if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))
return;
if (acpi_is_video_device(acpi_dev))
