On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Russell King <rmk at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > Which may or may not be a good thing depending how you look at it; it > means that once your kernel blanks, you get a lockdep dump. At that > point you lose lockdep checking for everything else because lockdep > disables itself after the first dump.
Fair enough, we may want to revert the lockdep checking for console_lock, and make re-enabling it part of the patch-series that fixes the locking. Daniel/Dave? Does that sound reasonable? Linus