On 12/31/2012 02:22 PM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote: > On 28.12.2012 22:48, Thierry Reding wrote: >> I disagree. We shouldn't be hiding this kind of detail behind an #ifdef. >> Instead it should be detected at runtime. Otherwise you'll need to build >> different versions of libdrm for every generation of Tegra. That may be >> fine for NVIDIA provided BSPs, but distributions would have a very hard >> time dealing with that. What we want is software that works unmodified >> on as many generations of Tegra as possible. > > I agree. The fences will be rejected by kernel and kernel knows about > number of sync points in each host1x revision. So, we could just submit > and look at return code. >
Agree. If we are able to do something dynamically, normally that'll be better. Terje, we can get the Tegra version in FUSE. I think we don't need this kind of try-catch logics. Mark > Terje >
