On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:54 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I've read through the patches and I'm hoping you don't volunteer me to > pick these up ... ;-)
Worth a try, right? :-) > But there doesn't seem to be anything that would > get worse through this lockdep annotation patch, right? No indeed, your patch looks fine, I just wanted to comment on the printk() thing.
