On 11/20/2012 07:39 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Okay just pushed out a bunch of -next queued stuff, > > I've been stuck on another project for a couple of weeks and haven't > really being paying enough attention to -next, so this is a heads up, > if someone has something big they want merged this window and I > haven't seen it yet or merged it yet, you should probably mention it > in a reply to this mail with a summary of where you think its at. > (e.g. atomic nuclear modesetting flipping). > > personal messages follow: > > Thomas: > I merged some of the vmware patches I saw, I got to > [6/8] drm/vmwgfx: Refactor resource management > it didn't apply, it wasn't trivial, so you need to resend the 6/7/8 on > top of this tree, or point me to what I missed that makes it all > magically work! > It appears they conflicted with the TTM sync_obj_arg removal patches. Please apply
[PATCH -next 0/5] drm/ttm: Get rid of a number of atomic read-modify-write ops addons (This is the diff for the latest version of Get rid of a number of atomic read-modify-write ops) [PATCH -next 0/3] vmwgfx stuff for -next rebased (This is the patches 6/8 that didn't apply previously) [PATCH -next] drm/ttm: Optimize vm locking using kref_get_unless_zero (Small patch that gets rid of a write lock around buffer object unreferences) Thanks, Thomas
