On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> wrote:
> Add a quirk which adds a new downclocked mode to the EDID of Samsung
> LTN121AT10-301 panels. This allows the intel driver to apply downclocking
> and save power.
>

Is there any feedback on the patch? I'd like to get it merged if possible.

Thanks,

Sean

> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
> ---
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | ? 47 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ?1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 7425e5c..e2e3d9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@
> ?#define EDID_QUIRK_FIRST_DETAILED_PREFERRED ? ?(1 << 5)
> ?/* use +hsync +vsync for detailed mode */
> ?#define EDID_QUIRK_DETAILED_SYNC_PP ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 6)
> +/* the panel supports, but does not include a lower clocked mode for lvds */
> +#define EDID_QUIRK_ADD_DOWNCLOCK_MODE ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 7)
>
> ?struct detailed_mode_closure {
> ? ? ? ?struct drm_connector *connector;
> @@ -119,6 +121,18 @@ static struct edid_quirk {
> ? ? ? ?/* Samsung SyncMaster 22[5-6]BW */
> ? ? ? ?{ "SAM", 596, EDID_QUIRK_PREFER_LARGE_60 },
> ? ? ? ?{ "SAM", 638, EDID_QUIRK_PREFER_LARGE_60 },
> +
> + ? ? ? /* Samsung TFT-LCD LTN121AT10-301 */
> + ? ? ? { "SEC", 0x3142, EDID_QUIRK_ADD_DOWNCLOCK_MODE },
> +};
> +
> +static struct downclock_rate {
> + ? ? ? char *vendor;
> + ? ? ? int product_id;
> + ? ? ? int clock;
> +} downclock_rate_list[] = {
> + ? ? ? /* Samsung TFT-LCD LTN121AT10-301 */
> + ? ? ? { "SEC", 0x3142, 56428},
> ?};
>
> ?/*** DDC fetch and block validation ***/
> @@ -481,6 +495,36 @@ static void edid_fixup_preferred(struct drm_connector 
> *connector,
> ? ? ? ?preferred_mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;
> ?}
>
> +static int edid_add_downclock(struct drm_connector *connector,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?struct edid *edid)
> +{
> + ? ? ? struct drm_display_mode *t, *cur_mode, *downclock_mode;
> + ? ? ? struct downclock_rate *rate;
> + ? ? ? int i;
> +
> + ? ? ? for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(downclock_rate_list); i++) {
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rate = &downclock_rate_list[i];
> +
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (edid_vendor(edid, rate->vendor) &&
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (EDID_PRODUCT_ID(edid) == rate->product_id))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break;
> + ? ? ? }
> + ? ? ? if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(downclock_rate_list))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0;
> +
> + ? ? ? list_for_each_entry_safe(cur_mode, t, &connector->probed_modes, head) 
> {
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!(cur_mode->type & DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? continue;
> +
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? downclock_mode = drm_mode_duplicate(connector->dev, cur_mode);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? downclock_mode->type &= ~DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? downclock_mode->clock = rate->clock;
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? drm_mode_probed_add(connector, downclock_mode);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 1;
> + ? ? ? }
> + ? ? ? return 0;
> +}
> +
> ?struct drm_display_mode *drm_mode_find_dmt(struct drm_device *dev,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? int hsize, int vsize, int fresh)
> ?{
> @@ -1554,6 +1598,9 @@ int drm_add_edid_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, 
> struct edid *edid)
> ? ? ? ?if (quirks & (EDID_QUIRK_PREFER_LARGE_60 | EDID_QUIRK_PREFER_LARGE_75))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?edid_fixup_preferred(connector, quirks);
>
> + ? ? ? if (quirks & EDID_QUIRK_ADD_DOWNCLOCK_MODE)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? num_modes += edid_add_downclock(connector, edid);
> +
> ? ? ? ?drm_add_display_info(edid, &connector->display_info);
>
> ? ? ? ?return num_modes;
> --
> 1.7.7.3
>

Reply via email to