Hi Dave,
On 25 May 2012 14:34, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
>
> include/linux/dma-buf.h: In function ?dma_buf_vmap?:
> include/linux/dma-buf.h:260:1: warning: no return statement in function
> returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
>
> Reported-by: wfg at linux.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
> ---
> ?include/linux/dma-buf.h | ? ?1 +
> ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index d8c2865..506bb7b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static inline void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>
> ?static inline void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> ?{
> + ? ? ? return NULL;
> ?}
I fixed this as part of rebasing while applying your vmap patch to my
for-next - so it is already in my pull request.
Best regards,
~Sumit.
>
> ?static inline void dma_buf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, void *vaddr)
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linaro-mm-sig mailing list
> Linaro-mm-sig at lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-mm-sig
