On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Christian K?nig <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote: > On 09.07.2012 17:36, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Christian K?nig <deathsimple at vodafone.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <deathsimple at vodafone.de> >> >> Bit too complex to my taste, what about attached patch, it's lot >> simpler. (Haven't tested >> the patch but it should work) > > Cool idea! Depending on the writeback mechanism might not be the best part > of it, but in general speaking all rings should have more than enough > scratch registers for that!!! > > Going to change it. > > Thanks, > Christian. >
Note that i haven't included the fence emit intentionally idea being if you resume ring you fence to emit the last fence as soon as possible and just pretend that the faulty ib succeeded. Cheers, Jerome
