On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:05:06PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > The following is the state-of-the-art i.MX IPU (Image Processing Unit) >> > DRM support. >> > >> > This code is around for quite some time now and has been posted several >> > times with different APIs, first with plain old framebuffer support, now >> > DRM, first platform device binding, now devicetree. Unfortunately there's >> > quite much code needed to get something useful out of the IPU, so these >> > patches haven't received a lot of attention from people not involved in >> > i.MX. I think we have now come to a point where this code needs more public >> > exposure and where it's easier to talk in incremental changes instead of >> > blobs. Therefore I request this to go to staging for some cycles. >> >> Dave, Greg, >> >> Comments to this one? I addressed the comments I received so far and am >> about to respin this series. Is it ok to put this to staging? If yes, >> should I move the whole stuff into drivers/staging/ or should it stay >> in drivers/gpu/drm with just a Kconfig dependency on STAGING? > > That's up to the DRM subsystem maintainer to choose.
Sorry guys been out of the loop on arm drivers due to other things, but probably should go in staging proper for now, until I can at least spend time reviewing it. Dave.
