Hi Laurent,
On Jan 30, 2012 7:48 PM, "Laurent Pinchart" <
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Friday 27 January 2012 10:43:28 Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > Some exporters may use DMA map/unmap APIs in dma-buf ops, which require
> > enum dma_data_direction for both map and unmap operations.
> >
> > Thus, the unmap dma_buf_op also needs to have enum dma_data_direction as
> > a parameter.
> >
> > Reported-by: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal at ti.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 7 +++++--
> > include/linux/dma-buf.h | 8 +++++---
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> > index 8afe2dd..c9a945f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -271,16 +271,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_map_attachment);
> > * dma_buf_ops.
> > * @attach: [in] attachment to unmap buffer from
> > * @sg_table: [in] scatterlist info of the buffer to unmap
> > + * @direction: [in] direction of DMA transfer
> > *
> > */
> > void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> > - struct sg_table *sg_table)
> > + struct sg_table *sg_table,
> > + enum dma_data_direction direction)
> > {
> > if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table))
> > return;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&attach->dmabuf->lock);
> > - attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table);
> > + attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table,
> > + direction);
> > mutex_unlock(&attach->dmabuf->lock);
> >
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > index 86f6241..847b026 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> > struct sg_table * (*map_dma_buf)(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
> > enum dma_data_direction);
> > void (*unmap_dma_buf)(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
> > - struct sg_table *);
> > + struct sg_table *,
> > + enum dma_data_direction);
> > /* TODO: Add try_map_dma_buf version, to return immed with -EBUSY
> > * if the call would block.
> > */
> > @@ -122,7 +123,8 @@ void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
> >
> > struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
> > enum dma_data_direction);
> > -void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *, struct
sg_table
> > *); +void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *, struct
> > sg_table *, + enum dma_data_direction);
> > #else
> >
> > static inline struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf
> > *dmabuf, @@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ static inline struct sg_table
> > *dma_buf_map_attachment( }
> >
> > static inline void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment
> > *attach, - struct sg_table
*sg)
> > + struct sg_table *sg, enum dma_data_direction
write)
>
> s/write/dir/ (or direction) ?
>
:-) sure.
> > {
> > return;
> > }
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
Best regards,
-Sumit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120131/399047b5/attachment-0001.html>
