On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you rebase this onto -next, I've no idea what it applies against.
You can skip this. I just rolled it into the VM patch.
Alex
>
> Dave.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>> ---
>> ?drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | ? ?7 +++----
>> ?1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
>> index de3cac0..e30a36f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
>> @@ -203,10 +203,9 @@ int radeon_cs_parser_init(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
>> void *data)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (p->chunks[i].chunk_id == RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?p->chunk_flags_idx = i;
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (p->chunks[i].chunk_id == RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS &&
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? !p->chunks[i].length_dw) {
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* zero length flags aren't useful */
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (p->chunks[i].length_dw == 0)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
>>
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?p->chunks[i].length_dw = user_chunk.length_dw;
>> --
>> 1.7.3.4
>>
