On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:00:52 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > If MSLEEP is indeed unused, I think it should just die - we have way too > much yelling cruft from dri1 yonder lying around that hides important > details like this. Otherwise
It was used, they just happened to all be redundant or mispellings of wait-for-vblank. All the remaining sleeps now look to be away from the atomic paths, and so MSLEEP can die for the time being. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
