On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:13:56PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> > The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> > 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> > for the 4 block (512) data.
> >
> > To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
> > passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
> > Data from the selected segment is then immediately
> > read via the regular DDC2 address using a repeated
> > I2C 'START' signal.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shirish S <s.shirish at samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > index a8743c3..cde7af0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > @@ -254,6 +254,8 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> unsigned char *buf,
> > int block, int len)
> > {
> > unsigned char start = block * EDID_LENGTH;
> > + unsigned char segment = block >> 1;
> > + unsigned char xfers = segment ? 3 : 2;
> > int ret, retries = 5;
> >
> > /* The core i2c driver will automatically retry the transfer if the
> > @@ -264,7 +266,12 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> unsigned char *buf,
> > */
> > do {
> > struct i2c_msg msgs[] = {
> > - {
> > + { /*set segment pointer */
>
> Missing whitespace after '/*'. Perhaps just drop the comment. I don't
> see much value in it.
>
> Done.
> > + .addr = DDC_SEGMENT_ADDR,
> > + .flags = segment ? 0 : I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK,
> > + .len = 1,
> > + .buf = &segment,
> > + }, {
> > .addr = DDC_ADDR,
> > .flags = 0,
> > .len = 1,
> > @@ -276,15 +283,22 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> unsigned char *buf,
> > .buf = buf,
> > }
> > };
> > - ret = i2c_transfer(adapter, msgs, 2);
> > + /* Avoid sending the segment addr to not upset non-compliant ddc
> > + * monitors.
> > + */
>
> Wrong indentation and comment style is wrong. I'm guessing this didn't go
> through checkpatch.pl.
>
> I never got tha above as either an error or warning in the checkpatch,
anyways have uploaded patch set 5 incorporating your comments.
> Otherwise looks OK to me.
>
> --
> Ville Syrj?l?
> Intel OTC
>
- Shirish
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120829/59cf9d49/attachment.html>
