On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 11:14:50AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> On 10/29/26 17:23, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> >> On 10/28/26 17:09, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 10:08:19AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> >>>> On 10/27/26 16:02, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >>>>> dma-heap already supports charging a specific cgroup at allocation
> >>>>> time via charge_fd in DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_ALLOC. However, dma-bufs can
> >>>>> originate from any exporter (DRM, V4L2, etc.), and the allocator may
> >>>>> not know the final owner at allocation time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Add DMA_BUF_IOCTL_XFER_CHARGE to transfer a dma-buf's memcg charge
> >>>>> to a different cgroup after allocation. The target is identified by
> >>>>> charge_fd, which may be a cgroupfd or a pidfd.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The transfer charges the new cgroup before uncharging the old one,
> >>>>> preserving the original charge on failure. An atomic cmpxchg on
> >>>>> dmabuf->memcg prevents races with concurrent transfers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not all dma-buf exporters back their buffers with reclaimable system
> >>>>> memory. Some represent device registers, VRAM, or carved-out pools
> >>>>> where size is not a meaningful memory cost. Add a memcg_account flag
> >>>>> to dma_buf_export_info that exporters set when their buffers should
> >>>>> participate in memcg accounting. The xfer ioctl returns -EOPNOTSUPP
> >>>>> for buffers that do not set the flag. Currently only the system heap
> >>>>> sets it, other exporters can opt in as needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Usage example:
> >>>>>   int cg_fd = open("/sys/fs/cgroup/clients/app1", O_RDONLY | 
> >>>>> O_DIRECTORY);
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   struct dma_buf_transfer_charge xfer = {
> >>>>>       .charge_fd = cg_fd,
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>   ioctl(dmabuf_fd, DMA_BUF_IOCTL_XFER_CHARGE, &xfer);
> >>>>>   /* charge now on app1's cgroup */
> >>>>>   close(cg_fd);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <[email protected]>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c           | 43 
> >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c |  1 +
> >>>>>  include/linux/dma-buf.h             |  5 +++++
> >>>>>  include/linux/memcontrol.h          |  9 ++++++++
> >>>>>  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  mm/memcontrol.c                     | 41 
> >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  6 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>>>> index f31f49ebd0af..07513ecedc10 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>>>> @@ -540,6 +540,45 @@ static long dma_buf_import_sync_file(struct 
> >>>>> dma_buf *dmabuf,
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>>  #endif
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +/* Transfer a dma-buf's memcg charge; see struct 
> >>>>> dma_buf_transfer_charge */
> >>>>> +static long dma_buf_xfer_charge(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> >>>>> +                               const void __user *user_data)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +       struct dma_buf_transfer_charge arg;
> >>>>> +       struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> >>>>> +       int ret = 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> >>>>> +               return -EFAULT;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG))
> >>>>> +               return 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (arg.flags != 0)
> >>>>> +               return -EINVAL;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (!dmabuf->memcg_account)
> >>>>> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       memcg = mem_cgroup_get_from_fd(arg.charge_fd);
> >>>>> +       if (IS_ERR(memcg))
> >>>>> +               return PTR_ERR(memcg);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (dmabuf->memcg == memcg)
> >>>>> +               goto skip_transfer;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (!mem_cgroup_transfer_dmabuf_charge(dmabuf, memcg)) {
> >>>>> +               ret = -ENOMEM;
> >>>>> +               goto skip_transfer;
> >>>>> +       }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       return 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +skip_transfer:
> >>>>> +       mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> >>>>> +       return ret;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> >>>>>                           unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>> @@ -590,6 +629,9 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> >>>>>                 return dma_buf_import_sync_file(dmabuf, (const void 
> >>>>> __user *)arg);
> >>>>>  #endif
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +       case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_XFER_CHARGE:
> >>>>> +               return dma_buf_xfer_charge(dmabuf, (const void __user 
> >>>>> *)arg);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>         default:
> >>>>>                 return -ENOTTY;
> >>>>>         }
> >>>>> @@ -750,6 +792,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct 
> >>>>> dma_buf_export_info *exp_info)
> >>>>>         dmabuf->size = exp_info->size;
> >>>>>         dmabuf->exp_name = exp_info->exp_name;
> >>>>>         dmabuf->owner = exp_info->owner;
> >>>>> +       dmabuf->memcg_account = exp_info->memcg_account;
> >>>>
> >>>> The initial charging should probably be done here as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> This way DMA-buf heaps only needs to pass in the charge_fd and we can 
> >>>> re-use the functionality for other DMA-buf exporters as well.
> >>>
> >>> The problem with doing the charge here is that it happens too late.
> >>> That is the reasoning for this proposal to move all the charging logic
> >>> into heap allocators before pages are allocated.
> >>
> >> Oh, that is a really good point we need to talk about.
> >>
> >> DMA-buf heaps is actually a rather simple use case, but we have way more 
> >> complex things.
> >>
> >> For example in some use cases the backing store of a DMA-buf is only 
> >> allocated on first use and only then it needs to be comitted to it's memcg 
> >> or dmem.
> > 
> > Yes. The idea is focus on heaps for now. But the uAPI is actually
> > agnostic of the time when the charge happens. When we deal with
> > lazy-allocation in the future we can just call the reserve/cancel
> > helpers wherever is more appropiate. As long as the pages are not
> > allocated, exporters do not set dmabuf->memcg, and XFER does not
> > work (returns -EOPNOTSUPP).
> 
> Yeah exactly that's the reason why I'm raising this topic. That approach 
> won't work in all cases.
> 
> See userspace is not aware that the kernel is delaying allocation or that the 
> kernel is allocating the backing store asynchroniously in a background worker 
> for example.
> 
> So returning -EOPNOTSUPP when the backing store is not allocated yet and 
> might be allocated later on is rather questionable uAPI because that is racy 
> by design.

Ah! I see what you meant now.

> >>
> >> I don't mind implementing it for DMA-buf heaps first, but we should have 
> >> the uAPI and it's handling so solid that it also works for future use 
> >> cases.
> > 
> > Agreed. I think we should cover all usecases with the current status.
> > Your feedback helped a lot in getting there!
> 
> I mean we can postpone that until we finally need it, but essentially we need 
> to be able to distinct between charging, e.g. making sure the cgroup has 
> enough free limit, and committing, e.g. allowing the resource to be reclaimed.
> 
> And then it is possible that when the memcg of a DMA-buf changes that only 
> the charging changes, but there isn't any comitted backing store yet...

Right. That would need adding a specific flag for committed pages or
a similar solution. When transfering an uncommited dmabuf only the
charge moves (limit reservation and dmabuf->memcg), the stat is
untouched. Once the backing store exists, the exporter commits, it
sets the flag and bumps MEMCG_DMABUF stat. For memory where its
backing store can go away (e.g., dynamic dma-buf sharing), it can
have a mirror function that drops the stat but keeps the charge.
That would resolve the -EOPNOTSUPP thingy, as transfer succeeds
when dmabuf->memcg is set even for uncommitted pages.

My question would be if all exporters know when memory is committed.
For those that only get, e.g., a firmware handle and cannot observe
the allocation, I guess the buffer can just remain reserved without
even being committed. Or in case of protected memory like OP-TEE
they would not even opt-in to begin with.

I do not mind adding that for next version, or leaving it for when
lazy exporters actually opt-in. It is not a big change either way.
Although, it may look weird while the system heap is the only user
and commits right away. But either way I can try to document the
flag / explain this discussion in the commit.

> 
> >>> What we could do is fill the dmabuf->memcg field when the flag is set
> >>> (i.e., committing into the dmabuf in the patch semantics). But for that
> >>> we'd need adding the memcg we want to charge it to into exp_info in
> >>> order to support charging to cgroups other than the allocator's (for
> >>> the common case would be simpler as we can just look at current).
> >>> Maybe that's what you meant?
> >>
> >> At least for the DMA-buf heaps use case that sounds reasonable for now.
> > 
> > Thanks! Next version will have the flag removed and just use
> > dmabuf->memcg as indicator, set within dma_buf_export().
> > Also, `nr_pages` will be computed within dma_buf_export(), the
> > contract being that exporters setting exp_info.memcg assert that
> > size reflects actual system memory bytes.
> 
> Thinking more about it I would also put changing dmabuf->memcg under the 
> dmabuf->resv lock instead of doing it with cmpxchg.
> 
> We don't need it currently, but the dmabuf->resv lock is used for all state 
> changes of the DMA-buf object and this operation is not performance critical 
> in any way possible.
> 
> If there is a problem with locking order we at least get lockdep screaming at 
> us very early and not when we want to extend the functionality in the future.

Sure, will do.

BR,
Albert.

> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>         spin_lock_init(&dmabuf->name_lock);
> >>>>>         init_waitqueue_head(&dmabuf->poll);
> >>>>>         dmabuf->cb_in.poll = dmabuf->cb_out.poll = &dmabuf->poll;
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c 
> >>>>> b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> >>>>> index adeea8cd328b..a764167167ba 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> >>>>> @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ static struct dma_buf *system_heap_allocate(struct 
> >>>>> dma_heap *heap,
> >>>>>         exp_info.size = buffer->len;
> >>>>>         exp_info.flags = fd_flags;
> >>>>>         exp_info.priv = buffer;
> >>>>> +       exp_info.memcg_account = true;
> >>>>>         dmabuf = dma_buf_export(&exp_info);
> >>>>>         if (IS_ERR(dmabuf)) {
> >>>>>                 ret = PTR_ERR(dmabuf);
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>>>> index 23ec0ff23fba..ac0ec88cab93 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>>>> @@ -433,6 +433,9 @@ struct dma_buf {
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>         /** @memcg: the cgroup to which this buffer is currently 
> >>>>> attributed */
> >>>>>         struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       /** @memcg_account: account buffer memory to cgroup */
> >>>>> +       bool memcg_account;
> >>>>>  };
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  /**
> >>>>> @@ -505,6 +508,7 @@ struct dma_buf_attachment {
> >>>>>   * @flags:     mode flags for the file
> >>>>>   * @resv:      reservation-object, NULL to allocate default one
> >>>>>   * @priv:      Attach private data of allocator to this buffer
> >>>>> + * @memcg_account:     account buffer memory to cgroup
> >>>>>   *
> >>>>>   * This structure holds the information required to export the buffer. 
> >>>>> Used
> >>>>>   * with dma_buf_export() only.
> >>>>> @@ -517,6 +521,7 @@ struct dma_buf_export_info {
> >>>>>         int flags;
> >>>>>         struct dma_resv *resv;
> >>>>>         void *priv;
> >>>>> +       bool memcg_account;
> >>>>>  };
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  /**
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> >>>>> index 6b30baa79fa9..36fddafbef4e 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> >>>>> @@ -679,6 +679,9 @@ bool mem_cgroup_reserve_dmabuf(struct mem_cgroup 
> >>>>> *memcg, gfp_t gfp,
> >>>>>  void mem_cgroup_commit_dmabuf(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct 
> >>>>> mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >>>>>                               unsigned int nr_pages);
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +bool mem_cgroup_transfer_dmabuf_charge(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> >>>>> +                                      struct mem_cgroup *new_memcg);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>  void __mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct folio *folio);
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  /**
> >>>>> @@ -1206,6 +1209,12 @@ static inline void 
> >>>>> mem_cgroup_cancel_dmabuf(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +static inline bool mem_cgroup_transfer_dmabuf_charge(struct dma_buf 
> >>>>> *dmabuf,
> >>>>> +                                                    struct mem_cgroup 
> >>>>> *new_memcg)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +       return true;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>  static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct folio *folio)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>>>> index e827c9d20c5d..ea957f4b1d38 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>>>> @@ -168,6 +168,31 @@ struct dma_buf_import_sync_file {
> >>>>>         __s32 fd;
> >>>>>  };
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +/**
> >>>>> + * struct dma_buf_transfer_charge - Transfer a dma-buf's memcg charge
> >>>>> + *
> >>>>> + * Any holder of a dma-buf file descriptor can perform a
> >>>>> + * DMA_BUF_IOCTL_XFER_CHARGE to attribute the buffer's memory
> >>>>> + * cost to a specific cgroup, or move it from one cgroup to
> >>>>> + * another.  The ioctl charges the new cgroup before uncharging
> >>>>> + * the old one atomically.  On failure the original charge is
> >>>>> + * preserved.  If the buffer has no existing charge, a new
> >>>>> + * charge is established.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +struct dma_buf_transfer_charge {
> >>>>> +       /** @flags: Reserved, must be zero */
> >>>>> +       __u32 flags; /* unused for now */
> >>>>> +       /**
> >>>>> +        * @charge_fd: File descriptor identifying the target cgroup.
> >>>>> +        *
> >>>>> +        * May be either a pidfd, in which case the charge moves to the
> >>>>> +        * memory cgroup of the referenced process, or a cgroupfd 
> >>>>> obtained
> >>>>> +        * by opening a cgroup v2 directory, in which case the charge 
> >>>>> moves
> >>>>> +        * directly to that cgroup's memory controller.
> >>>>> +        */
> >>>>> +       __u32 charge_fd;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>  #define DMA_BUF_BASE           'b'
> >>>>>  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC     _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct 
> >>>>> dma_buf_sync)
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> @@ -179,5 +204,6 @@ struct dma_buf_import_sync_file {
> >>>>>  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B     _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, __u64)
> >>>>>  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct 
> >>>>> dma_buf_export_sync_file)
> >>>>>  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 3, struct 
> >>>>> dma_buf_import_sync_file)
> >>>>> +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_XFER_CHARGE      _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 4, struct 
> >>>>> dma_buf_transfer_charge)
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  #endif
> >>>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >>>>> index 7b841b905759..3adc84fe6668 100644
> >>>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> >>>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >>>>> @@ -5786,6 +5786,47 @@ void mem_cgroup_cancel_dmabuf(struct mem_cgroup 
> >>>>> *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> >>>>>                 refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +/**
> >>>>> + * mem_cgroup_transfer_dmabuf_charge - move a dma-buf charge
> >>>>> + * @dmabuf: buffer to transfer charge
> >>>>> + * @new_memcg: target memcg; caller must hold a reference
> >>>>> + *
> >>>>> + * Transfers the charge for @dmabuf to @new_memcg and, on
> >>>>> + * success, stores @new_memcg in @dmabuf->memcg.
> >>>>> + * Returns %true on success, %false if the charge against @new_memcg
> >>>>> + * failed or a concurrent transfer raced on @dmabuf->memcg.
> >>>>> + * On failure the caller retains its reference to @new_memcg.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +bool mem_cgroup_transfer_dmabuf_charge(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> >>>>> +                                      struct mem_cgroup *new_memcg)
> >>>>
> >>>> I would make that more generic instead of dmabuf specific. E.g. 
> >>>> something like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> bool mem_cgroup_transfer_charge(struct struct mem_cgroup **ptr_memcg, 
> >>>> struct mem_cgroup *new_memcg, enum memcg_stat_item item, unsigned int 
> >>>> nr_pages)
> >>>
> >>> Ah yes, I like this generalization. And the implementation remains
> >>> mostly the same. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +       struct mem_cgroup *old_memcg = READ_ONCE(dmabuf->memcg);
> >>>>
> >>>>> +       unsigned int nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(dmabuf->size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>>>
> >>>> This way we can also document in the DMA-buf caller that this 
> >>>> conversation must be ok when memcg_account is true.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Christian.
> >>>>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> >>>>> +               return true;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (!mem_cgroup_reserve_dmabuf(new_memcg, GFP_KERNEL, nr_pages))
> >>>>> +               return false;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       mod_memcg_state(new_memcg, MEMCG_DMABUF, nr_pages);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (cmpxchg(&dmabuf->memcg, old_memcg, new_memcg) != old_memcg) 
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> +               mod_memcg_state(new_memcg, MEMCG_DMABUF, -nr_pages);
> >>>>> +               mem_cgroup_cancel_dmabuf(new_memcg, nr_pages);
> >>>>> +               return false;
> >>>>> +       }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       if (old_memcg) {
> >>>>> +               /* Uncharge old cgroup */
> >>>>> +               mod_memcg_state(old_memcg, MEMCG_DMABUF, -nr_pages);
> >>>>> +               mem_cgroup_cancel_dmabuf(old_memcg, nr_pages);
> >>>>> +               mem_cgroup_put(old_memcg);
> >>>>> +       }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       return true;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>  /**
> >>>>>   * mem_cgroup_uncharge_dmabuf - uncharge a dma-buf from its memcg
> >>>>>   * @dmabuf: buffer to uncharge
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> > 
> 

Reply via email to