On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:02:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Use pp_control instead of re-reading? Could, but you'll note a later patch eliminates both pp_status and pp_control local variables, so I didn't bother to clean this up when refactoring. > dp_aux_ch does the low-level io for the below, so either this one or the > below three hunks look a bit redundant. Yeah, probably not necessary. I just added checks everywhere I could think of to try and figure out where power was not being applied when needed. Should I bother to include this patch in the series at all? It's purely for diagnostics to make sure the panel is powered during all aux channel transactions. -- keith.packard at intel.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20110930/7730cc2c/attachment.pgp>
